In oil and gas, chemical, and power generation facilities, not all assets carry the same risk. A low-pressure storage tank and a high-pressure reactor are not the same problem. Cenosco IMS applies API 580/581 and ASME PCC-3 methodology to rank every piece of pressure equipment by actual risk — the combination of how likely it is to fail and how bad the consequences would be. The result: your most critical assets get the most attention, and your inspection budget goes further.
ImageGrafix is a certified Cenosco Partner — a status that reflects certified expertise, sustained investment in training and accreditation, and a proven track record of successful customer deployments.
Risk-ranked inspection planning for pressure vessels, piping, heat exchangers, tanks, and rotating equipment — using API 580/581 methodology
IMS – Inspection Management Full inspection lifecycle management — inspection plans, work packs, findings, recommendations, and regulatory reporting in one system
Corrosion loop definition, degradation modelling, and remaining-life prediction for piping and pressure equipment
Defining and monitoring the safe operating envelope for process equipment — with alerts when parameters approach critical limits
Risk-based thinking starts at asset selection — understanding which equipment configurations carry the most long-term integrity risk
Inspection strategies defined during design (from HAZOP outputs and material specifications)
Commissioning data — baseline wall thickness, weld records, post-weld heat treatment — establishes the IMS data foundation
Integrity Operating Window
Risk-Based Inspections, Inspection Management, Corrosion Management, and Integrity Operating Windows
If your inspection program is still based on fixed intervals rather than actual risk, we can show you exactly what a transition to RBI looks like — including how long it takes, what data you need, and what it saves.
